1.
Carl Elliott "What New Zealand’s "Unfortunate Experiment” Can Teach Us About Medical Abuse" The Boston Review (Boston, 6 November 2017). Available from: http://bostonreview.net/science-nature/carl-elliott-what-new-zealands-unfortunate-experiment-can-teach-us-about-medical-abuse
2.
Bryder L. Linda Bryder A history of the ‘unfortunate experiment’ at National Women’s Hospital (Auckland University Press, Auckland, 2009) [Internet]. Auckland, N.Z.: Auckland University Press; 2009. Available from: http://ap01.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=10250583840002091&institutionId=2091&customerId=2090
3.
Health and Disability Commissioner (Code of Health and Disability Services Consumer’ Rights) Regulations 1996 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hdc.org.nz/your-rights/about-the-code/code-of-health-and-disability-services-consumers-rights/
4.
Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 [Internet]. Available from: http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1994/0088/46.0/DLM333584.html
5.
Chisholm D. Beauty and the Breast Surgeon. North & South [Internet]. 2013 Jan 1;(322):48–54. Available from: http://ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=anh&AN=84343830&site=ehost-live&scope=site
6.
New Zealand Law Foundation JM. New Zealand’s Code of Patient’s Rights. In: The Cartwright papers; essays on the cervical cancer inquiry 1987-88. Wellington, N.Z.: Bridget Williams Books with the Law Foundation of New Zealand; 2010. p. 150–69.
7.
Health and Disability Commissioner, Case Note 09HDC01315, 22 January 2010 (Inappropriate language and lack of respect for patient) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions/search-decisions/2010/09hdc01315/
8.
Health and Disability Commissioner, Opinion 08HDC07350, 15 March 2010 (DHB, GP & gynaecologist, and patient with cervical cancer) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hdc.org.nz/media/1885/08hdc07350gynaecologist.pdf
9.
Ambros v Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) & Ors CIV-2004-404-003261 Mar 21, 2005, Harrison & Heath JJ [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/51908818-9429-4a91-a4dd-4f0a443f309d/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
10.
Meek v Health & Disability Commissioner [2016] NZHC 1205 [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/088c5cb4-14f4-4ed9-a4dc-3de5f85614b1/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
11.
Ombudsmen Act 1975 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1975/0009/latest/DLM431166.html
12.
Beverly Wakem Ombudsmen Act Opinion: Complaint about Health and Disability Commissioner assessment process (October 2013) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/resources-and-publications/opinions/ombudsman-act-opinions
13.
Health and Disability Commissioner, Opinion 04HDC12081, 21 December 2005 (Emergency Medicine Registrar, Dr. C Otago District Health Board) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions/search-decisions/2005/04hdc12081/
14.
Health and Disability Commissioner, Opinion 04HDC12081, 21 December 2005 (Misdiagnosis of patient suffering from abdominal aortic aneurysm) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions/search-decisions/2005/04hdc12081/
15.
Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2003/0048/latest/whole.html#DLM204310
16.
Skegg PDG, Paterson R, Manning J, Dawson J, Peart NS, Delany L, et al. Ron Paterson ‘Assessment and Investigation of Complaints’ in PDG Skegg and Ron Paterson (eds) Health Law in New Zealand (Thomson Reuters, Wellington, 2015) 903. Health Law in New Zealand. Wellington [New Zealand]: Thomson Reuters; 2015.
17.
Crimes Act 1961 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/137.0/DLM327382.html
18.
Great Britain. Court of Appeal. R v Sellu [2016] EWCA Crim 1716, [2017] 1 Cr App R 24. The criminal appeal reports.
19.
R v Adomako [1995]1 AC 171, [1994] 3 All ER 79 (HL) [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/0df62bf8-e14a-483f-bf11-962eed45687c/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
20.
R v Misra [2004] EWCA Crim 2375 [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/a587e517-92be-48cd-813c-3eaa016d26cb/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
21.
Marks v Director of Health and Disability Proceedings [2009] NZCA 151, [2009] 3 NZLR 108 [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/60ddc499-8eff-4a21-afc9-5b26e78ae036/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
22.
Martin v Director of Proceedings [2010] NZAR 333 (HC) [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/122978f6-2025-49f6-8cc2-8b6fb4909604/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
23.
Health and Disability Commissioner ‘Policy Document - Naming Providers in Public HDC Reports’ (1 July 2008) < www.hdc.org.nz > [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions/naming-policy/
24.
Gravatt v Coroner’s Court at Auckland [2013] NZHC 390, [2013] NZAR 345 [Internet]. Vol. 390. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/7b9c9449-1689-44cb-be22-206ac0035940/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
25.
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1993] Fam 95 (CA) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iclr.co.uk.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/document/1991002175/casereport_30421/html
26.
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1990/0109/latest/whole.html#DLM225509
27.
HE v A Hospital NHS Trust [2003] EWHC 1017 (Fam), [2003] 2 FLR 408. HE v A Hospital NHS Trust [2003] EWHC 1017 (Fam), [2003] 2 FLR 408. 2.
28.
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] 2 WLR 768 (UKSC) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iclr.co.uk.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/document/2011211830/casereport_32773/html
29.
Stubbs v Health and Disability Commissioner HC Wellington CIV-2009-485-002146 February 8 2010 [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/document/?pdmfid=1230042&crid=72731d42-1e4d-4ba1-aa6e-d29c962d2dd8&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fcases-nz%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A5D76-P2G1-JYYX-61KJ-00000-00&pddocid=urn%3AcontentItem%3A5D76-P2G1-JYYX-61KJ-00000-00&pdcontentcomponentid=274472&pdteaserkey=sr1&pdicsfeatureid=1517128&pditab=allpods&ecomp=dfmhk&earg=sr1&prid=5b3b3910-c9eb-4154-884f-72f2aaece607
30.
Health and Disability Commissioner, Opinion 04HDC00031, 24 February 2005 (Orthopaedic Surgeon Dr B Case) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions/search-decisions/2005/04hdc00031/
31.
Health and Disability Commissioner, Opinion 07HDC11318, 17 October 2008 (General Surgeon Dr E Case) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions/search-decisions/2008/07hdc11318/
32.
Health and Disability Commissioner, Case Note 14HDC00054, 15 June 2015 (Spinal accessory nerve severed by GP) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions/search-decisions/2015/14hdc00054/
33.
Health and Disability Commissioner, Opinion 00HDC08358, 9 May 2002 (Written consent to hysterectomy) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions/search-decisions/2002/00hdc08358/
34.
Chisholm, Donna. Donna Chisholm ‘Good Op, Bad Op?’ A top surgeon defends his record" North & South (New Zealand, December 2010) 62. North & South [Internet]. 2010;(297):62–8. Available from: http://ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=anh&AN=55770987&site=ehost-live&scope=site
35.
In re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation) [1990] 2 AC 1 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iclr.co.uk.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/document/1981002107/casereport_9863/html
36.
A Local Authority v E [2012] EWCH 1639 (COP), [2012] Med LR 472. Medical law reports. 2010;
37.
Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1988/0004/latest/DLM126528.html?src=qs
38.
KR v MR [2004] 2 NZLR 847 (HC) [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/96ac892d-5350-41e3-8403-696800450b97/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
39.
Edwards R, Butterworths Asia (Firm). R v Cambridge Health Authority, ex parte B (1995) 25 BMLR 5 (QB). Butterworths Medico-Legal Reports. 1992;
40.
R v Cambridge Health Authority, Ex parte B [1995] 1 WLR 898 (CA) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iclr.co.uk.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/document/1991003652/casereport_19987/html
41.
Shortland v Northland Health Ltd [1998] 1 NZLR 433 (CA) [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/a19fe3fa-6992-4caf-8ba3-5a2f106f19d7/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
42.
Carter v Canada [2015] 1 SCR 331, 384 DLR (4th) [Internet]. Canada Supreme Court Reports. 2015. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.cscreports/canadalr0233&i=342
43.
R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2014] 3 WLR 200 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iclr.co.uk.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/document/2011202797/casereport_21101/html
44.
Seales v Attorney-General [2015] NZHC 1239, [2015] 3 NZLR 556 [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/21697a9d-bb80-4b06-b02d-008cd81afb45/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
45.
Auckland Area Health Board v Attorney General [1993] 1 NZLR 235 (HC) [Internet]. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/210bf068-652f-43a7-b967-e1d25970eb70/?context=1230042&federationidp=TZRTHJ54655
46.
Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords, Great Britain. Supreme Court of Judicature, Great Britain. Privy Council. Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789,[1993] 1 All ER 821 (HL). The All England law reports: Consolidated tables and index. 1987;
47.
Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2013] UKSC 67, [2013] 3 WLR 1299 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iclr.co.uk.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/document/2011204109/casereport_13298/html
