Aitken, G. (no date) ‘TeKuaka012011.pdf’. Available at: https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/education/about/news-and-events/docs/tekuaka/TeKuaka012011.pdf.
COWIE, B. and BELL, B. (1999) ‘A Model of Formative Assessment in Science Education’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), pp. 101–116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993026.
Davies, A. and Hill, M. (2009) Making classroom assessment work. New Zealand ed. Wellington, N.Z.: NZCER Press.
Dean, J. (2011) ‘A profile portraying a contemporary gifted young child’, Apex: an educational journal for teachers and parents of gifted and talented children, 16(1). Available at: http://www.giftedchildren.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/v16dean.pdf.
Foreman, P. and Arthur-Kelly, M. (eds) (2014) Inclusion in action. 4th edition. South Melbourne, Vic: Cengage Learning Australia.
Fraser, D. and Hill, M. (eds) (2016a) The professional practice of teaching in New Zealand. 5th edition. South Melbourne, Vic: Cengage Learning.
Fraser, D. and Hill, M. (eds) (2016b) The professional practice of teaching in New Zealand. 5th edition. South Melbourne, Vic: Cengage Learning.
Fraser, D., Moltzen, R. and Ryba, K. (2005) Learners with special needs in Aotearoa New Zealand. 3rd ed. Palmerston North, N.Z.: Dunmore Press.
Heacox, D. (2012) Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: how to reach and teach all learners. Updated anniversary ed. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
Hook, P. (2015) First steps with SOLO taxonomy: applying the model in your classroom. Laughton, United Kingdom: Essential Resources.
Hook, P. and Mills, J. (2011) SOLO taxonomy: a guide for schools. Laughton, U.K.: Essential Resources.
John Hattie and Helen Timperley (2007) ‘The Power of Feedback’, Review of Educational Research, 77(1), pp. 81–112. Available at: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/auckland.ac.nz?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jstor.org%2Fstable%2F4624888%3Fseq%3D1%23page_scan_tab_contents.
McDonald, L. et al. (2016) ‘Teaching high-expectation strategies to teachers through an intervention process’, Professional Development in Education, 42(2), pp. 290–307. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.980009.
Moltzen, R. (2011) Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives. 3rd ed. Auckland, N.Z.: Pearson.
Pohl, M. (2006) Still learning to think thinking to learn: into Bloom’s and beyond! : planning with a thinking focus. Heatherton, Vic: Hawker Brownlow Education.
Rubie-Davies, C. (2014) Becoming a High Expectation Teacher: Raising the bar [electronic resource]. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Available at: http://ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=830222&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EK&ppid=Page-__-70.
Smith, C. and New Zealand. Ministry of Education (2012) ‘Gifted and talented students: meeting their needs in New Zealand schools’. Wellington, N.Z.: Published for the Ministry of Education by Learning Media. Available at: http://www.library.auckland.ac.nz/external/ebooks/Gifted%20and%20talented%20students.pdf.
Strickland, C.A. and Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (2007) Tools for high-quality differentiated instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2014a) The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners [electronic resource]. 2nd ed. Alexandria: ASCD. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/lib/auckland/reader.action?ppg=25&docID=10883053&tm=1468457824268.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2014b) The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners [electronic resource]. 2nd ed. Alexandria: ASCD. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/auckland/reader.action?ppg=56&docID=1709534&tm=1497994351969.
Tunstall, P. and Gsipps, C. (1996) ‘Teacher Feedback to Young Children in Formative Assessment: a typology’, British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), pp. 389–404. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192960220402.
Zembylas, M. and McGlynn, C. (2012) ‘Discomforting pedagogies: emotional tensions, ethical dilemmas and transformative possibilities’, British Educational Research Journal, 38(1), pp. 41–59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.523779.